Focus and Scope
The "Journal of Intelligent System and Emerging Technologies" would likely focus on publishing research related to the development, applications, and advancements of intelligent systems and emerging technologies. Here's a breakdown of what the aims and scope might entail:
- Intelligent Systems: The journal would cover a wide range of topics related to intelligent systems, which are systems that can perceive, reason, learn, and make decisions to some extent. This could include research on artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, computer vision, robotics, and more.
- Emerging Technologies: The journal would likely emphasize technologies that are relatively new or rapidly evolving. This could encompass a variety of areas such as quantum computing, edge computing, blockchain, augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), Internet of Things (IoT), and any other technology that is on the cutting edge of development.
- Research Articles: The journal would publish original research articles that contribute to the understanding, development, and application of intelligent systems and emerging technologies. These articles might present novel algorithms, methodologies, experimental results, theoretical insights, and practical implementations.
- Applications: The scope would likely extend to various application domains where intelligent systems and emerging technologies are being employed. This could include healthcare, finance, manufacturing, transportation, entertainment, education, and more. Research articles that demonstrate how these technologies are being practically utilized would be of interest.
- Interdisciplinary Approach: Given the nature of emerging technologies, the journal might encourage an interdisciplinary approach. Contributions from fields like computer science, engineering, mathematics, social sciences, and more could be welcomed if they are relevant to the advancement of intelligent systems and emerging technologies.
- Trends and Future Directions: The journal might feature articles that analyze trends in technology development and predict future directions. This could help researchers, practitioners, and policymakers stay informed about the potential impact of these technologies on society, ethics, and the economy.
- Review Articles: In addition to original research, the journal might publish review articles that summarize the state-of-the-art in specific areas of intelligent systems and emerging technologies. These reviews could provide a comprehensive overview of existing research and highlight challenges and opportunities.
Section Policies
Articles
 Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
Peer Review Process
Submitted papers are evaluated by anonymous referees by single-blind peer review for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation. The Editor shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible.
The process can be described as follow.
1. The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated whether it is suitable for the Jurnal Teknik Elektro Komputer dan Informatika focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similarity score by using Turnitin. The decision is rejected or accepted for a review process.
2. The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Single Blind Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses.
3. Afterward, the editorial team meeting suggested the final decision on the revised manuscript by the authors.
4. Finally, the Editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.
5. The accepted manuscript then continued to the copyediting and layout editing process to prepare the camera-ready paper.
Review Outcomes
Utilizing feedback from the peer review process, the Editor will make a final publication decision. Decisions categories include:
- Reject - Rejected manuscripts will not be published and authors will not have the opportunity to resubmit a revised version of the manuscript to this journal.
- Accept with Major Revision - Manuscript will be reviewed again after some major modifications are made.
- Accept with Minor Revisions - Manuscripts receiving an accept-pending-revisions decision will be published in this journal under the condition that minor modifications are made. Revisions will be reviewed by an editor to ensure necessary updates are made prior to publication.
- Accept - Accepted manuscripts will be published in the current form with no further modifications required
Publication Frequency
Journal of Intelligent and Emerging Technologies is a peer-reviewed international journal published three times a year in March, July and November.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
About the Journal
Journal of Intelligent System and Emerging Technologies (JISET) is a peer-reviewed international journal published three times a year in March, July and November. The journal is published by Online Prodigies. The main aim is to resolve emerging and outstanding problems revealed by recent social and technological change. JISET provides the platform for the researchers to present and evaluate their work from both theoretical and technical aspects and to share their views. The journal welcomes high quality original research papers, survey paper, review paper, and technical notes as well as the discussion papers. The journal registered in the CrossRef system with Digital Object Identifier (DOI). The journal has been indexed by Google Scholar and DOAJ.
Author Guidelines
Papers are invited from anywhere in the world, and so authors are asked to ensure that sufficient context is provided for all readers to appreciate their contribution.
Carefully read the submission guidelines as follows:
A. General Requirements
- The minimum standard requirements of the Journal of Intelligent Systems and Emerging Technologies must be Written in English.
- The length of the submitted paper is at least 6 pages and no more than 16 pages. Editors will be evaluated if the papers are needing more pages than 16 pages.
- Use a tool such as Zotero, Mendeley, or EndNote for reference management and formatting (or use the manual references if difficult)
- Make sure that your paper is prepared using the Msword Template and Latex Template
B. Structure of The Manuscript
The manuscript must be prepared and suggested present following the structure:
- Title. The title of the article should be fewest, without Acronym or abbreviation
- Abstract. The Abstract has 200-300 Words; with No citation; State in the abstract a primary objective, research design, research contribution, methodology, main outcomes, results, and conclusions.
- Section structure. Authors are suggested to present their articles in the section structure: Introduction, Method, Results and Discussion, and Conclusion
- References. Expect a minimum of 40 references primarily with a minimum of 80% to international journal papers from Science Direct or indexed by Scopus Database and choose IEEE style. Please, don't use unpredictable website sources.
One author should be designated as the corresponding author and provide the following information:
- E-mail address
- Full postal address
Please note that any papers which fail to meet our requirements will be returned to the author for amendment. Only papers that are submitted in the correct style will be considered by the Editors.
Withdrawal of Manuscripts
The author is not allowed to withdraw the submitted manuscripts because the withdrawal is a waste of valuable resources that editors and referees spent a great deal of time processing the submitted manuscripts, and works invested by the Publisher. However, the authors could suggest the withdrawal if there is no updated progress review information after six months from our side.
If the author still requests the withdrawal of his/her manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, the author will be punished by paying $200 per manuscript, as a withdrawal penalty to the publisher. However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted manuscript from one journal if accepted by another journal.
The withdrawal of the manuscript after the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author will be punished by paying US$400 per manuscript. Withdrawal of the manuscript is only allowed after the withdrawal penalty has been fully paid to the Publisher. If the author doesn't agree to pay the penalty, the author and his/her affiliation will be blacklisted for publication in this journal. Even, his/her previously published articles will be removed from our online system.
Email for requesting withdrawal: kbudiz@yahoo.com
APC
This journal charges the following author fees.
Publication Ethics
Journal of Intelligent Systems and Emerging Technologies is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices. The Editorial Board is responsible for, among others, preventing publication malpractice. Unethical behavior is unacceptable, and the Journal of Intelligent Systems and Emerging Technologies does not tolerate plagiarism in any form. Authors who submitted articles: affirm that manuscript contents are original. Furthermore, the authors’ submission also implies that the manuscript has not been published previously in any language, either wholly or partly, and is not currently submitted for publication elsewhere. Editors, authors, and reviewers, within the Journal of Intelligent Systems and Emerging Technologies, are to be fully committed to good publication practice and accept the responsibility for fulfilling the following duties and responsibilities, as set by the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors. As part of the Core Practices, COPE has written guidelines on the http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines.
Section A: Publication and authorship
- All submitted papers are subject to a strict peer-review process by reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular manuscript.
- The review process is double-blind peer-review.
- The factors that are taken into account in the review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability, and language.
- The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
- If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
- Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
- The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.
- No research can be included in more than one publication.
Section B: Authors’ responsibilities
- Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
- Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
- Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
- The authors must participate in the peer-review process.
- Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
- All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
- The authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
- The authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
- The authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscripts.
- Authors must report any errors they discover in their published papers to the Editors.
Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities
- Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
- Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.
- Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
- Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
- Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
- Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Section D: Editors’ responsibilities
- Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
- Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
- Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
- Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
- Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
- Editors should have a clear picture of research funding sources.
- Editors should base their decisions solely on the papers’ importance, originality, clarity, and relevance to the publication’s scope.
- Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
- Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
- Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
- Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
- Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
- Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions; they should have proof of misconduct.
Retraction
The papers published in the International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Emerging Technologies will be considered to retract in the publication if:
- They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g., data fabrication) or honest error (e.g., miscalculation or experimental error)
- the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission, or justification (i.e., cases of redundant publication)
- it constitutes plagiarism
- it reports unethical research
The mechanism of retraction follows the Retraction Guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf.
Plagiarism Policy
The maximal plagiarism is 25% with each source maximal is 4%.
