Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Komputer Terapan dan Sains adalah jurnal semi-elektronik (tersedia dalam bentuk softcopy dan hardcopy) yang diterbitkan setiap tahun secara berkala pada bulan April dan September. Jurnal membahas tentang kajian terkini di bidang ilmu komputer, teknologi informasi dan komunikasi.

Jurnal Komputer Terapan dan Sains bertujuan menjadi wadah publikasi ilmiah bagi peneliti, akademisi, maupun praktisi yang akan membagi pengetahuan dan pengalaman mereka di dalam pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan di bidang ilmu komputer dan bidang ilmu teknologi informasi dan komunikasi di Indonesia.

Jurnal Komputer Terapan dan Sains menerima tulisan yang memiliki topik inter-disiplin di bidang, Tekink Komputer, Sistem komputer, Teknik informatika, Sistem Informasi dan turunan dari ilmu komputer. Topik dapat berupa (tapi tidak ter batas pada):

1. Jaringan dan keamanan jaringan

2. Robotika, Sistem Kendali dan Sistem Tertanam

3. Internet of Things

4. Elektro dan Mekatronik Cerdas

5. Artificial Intelligence (Kecerdasan Buatan)

6. Software Engineering (Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak)

7. Information System (Sistem Informasi)

8. Computer Based Learning (Pembelajaran Berbasis Komputer)

9. Computer Networking & Data Communication (Jaringan Komputer & Komunikasi Data)

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The practice of peer review is applied to ensure that excellent research is published. It is an objective process at the heart of high-quality scholarly publishing and is carried out by all reputable scientific journals. Our referees therefore play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of the Jurnal Komputer Terapan dan Rekayasa Sains and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedures.

Initial manuscript evaluation

Firstly, the editors evaluate all manuscripts. The rejected manuscripts in this stage have insufficiently originality,  serious scientific flaws, poor grammar, or are out of the aims and scope of the journal. 

Type of Peer Review

This journal employs a double-blind review process, where the referee remains anonymous throughout the process.

Reviewers selection

Reviewers are selected to review the paper according to their expertise. Our reviewers database is constantly being updated. We welcome suggestions for reviewers from the author though these recommendations may or may not be used.

Review reports

The reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:

  • Is the manuscript original, and international, not local, significance?
  • Is the manuscript methodically and uses appropriate techniques?
  • Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions.
  • Has correct references to previous relevant work.

Language editors

A group of language editors ensures the linguistic and stylistic quality of the manuscript. In the review stage, they formulate recommendations to the authors on how to improve the language of their text (minor shortcomings) or formulate advice to contact a native speaker (major shortcomings).

How long does the review process take?

Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within six weeks. The reviews may request more than one revision of a manuscript.

Final report

A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by reviewers

Editor's Decision

Reviewers recommend the editors, who are responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.